awesomeindex.com awesomeindex.com
   Main :> About Us :> Security & Privacy :> ToS :> Add Your Link :> Add Article
Search:   
Get Free Links
 
 

Culture & Art

 

Home Family & Garden

 

Online Shopping

 

People & Society

 

Automobile & Automotive

 

News & Media

 

Jobs & Careers

 

Computers & Networking

 

Drink & Food

 

Science & Space

 

Academics & Education

 

Policies & Law

 

Finance & Banking

 

Companies & Business

 

Children

 

Property & Estate

 

Hotels & Travel

 

Relationship & Lifestyle

 

Self Enhancement

 

Recreation

 

Online & Indoor Games

 

Adventure & Sports

 

Medical Care

 

Health & Hygiene

 

Main › Hotels & Travel › Air Travel & Airlines
 

The Bell P-39 Airacobra

 

Author: Michael Russell

Made by Bell Aircraft Corporation, the P-39 Airacobra was produced from 1939 until 1944 and it might be called the most controversial US fighter plane of WWII. It was embraced heartily by the Soviets and equally shunned by both the USAAC and the RAF; it was hounded by myths and falsehoods that added to the controversy to this day.

It was off to an auspicious start when the first unit, the XP-39 was unveiled at Wright Field on April 6, 1939 to the gasps and ahs of the assembled dignitaries. One could see at first glance the innovations and peculiarities incorporated into Bell's new Airacobra. The P-39 was the first fighter plane to use a tricycle landing gear configuration, later adopted by all aircraft of all makes. One feature that didn't catch on was the car-like door by which the pilot entered and exited the cockpit, instead of the usual sliding cockpit canopy.

Basically, the Aircobra was designed around a gun, the Colt M4 37mm cannon. To make room for the cannon in the nose, the powerplant, an Allison V-1710 was installed mid-fuselage behind the pilot. It was fitted with a B-5 turbo-supercharger and rated at 1,150 hp. This was essentially the same engine that was so successful in the P-38 Lightning. The power was transmitted to the propeller via a drive shaft that ran under the pilot's seat. The unarmed and unarmored prototype could reach a then stunning speed of over 390 mph and climb to 20,000 ft in five minutes.

This is where the first bad decision was made regarding the P-39, a mistake that would haunt it for all its fighting days. Despite its admirable performance during test flights, the Wright-Field engineers felt it had too much drag, so to streamline the design the canopy was lowered, the wingspan cut by two feet and the fuselage lengthened by one foot. Most importantly, the turbo-supercharger inlet was reduced in size and moved from the side of the fuselage to a position directly behind the canopy. This meant that the turbo-supercharger had to be replaced with a single stage supercharger with the entirely predictable result that the high-altitude performance dropped dramatically as did the maximum speed and rate of climb.

The P-39D was the first mass-produced model in 1941, with all following models being quite similar. The D-1 temporarily replaced the 37mm cannon with a 20mm cannon. The P-39D did have an updated Allison engine, which produced an additional 175 hp. The basic specs of the P-39D were: Max speed of 360 mph at 15,000 ft, Climb to 20,000 in 11.7 min. Range: 600 miles at economical cruise, Armament: one 37 mm nose cannon, 2 50 calibre nose guns, 2 30 calibre guns in each wing. It was a light aircraft with an empty weight of 6,300 lbs and max weight of 9,200 lbs. The final and most numerous production version was the P-39Q with 4,905 being built.

In summer 1939, the first orders for the P-39 was placed by France, but none were delivered because France fell too quickly to the Germans. Britain accepted the French order but the RAF pilots hated the Airacobra mainly because of its now poor performance over 20,000 ft and a tendency to spin, with a marked difficulty to recover from a spin. Also they complained that the M4 cannon had a tendency to jam, but they did concede it was an effective fighter below 15,000 feet. They eventually returned the aircraft back to USAAC who used them in the early days of the Pacific war, in places like Guadalcanal.

The US pilots had the same complaints as the RAF and were soon requesting transfers to the P-38 squadrons. In fact there was a standing joke about the P-39; the RAF had renamed the model the P-400 and the story was that a P-400 was a P-39 with a Zero on its tail. As the P-38 Lightning was phased in, the P-39s were ferried to Russia as part of the Allied assistance to the Eastern front. Of the 9,585 P-39s built, 4,500 were given to the USSR. The P-39 was fast gaining the reputation of being the worst fighter plane of WWII.

Here the P-39's luck changed for the better. The Russian pilots loved the Airacobra, nicknamed it the "Britchik" (Little Shaver, from the Russian slang for strafing - "shaving") and began to have great success with it. From 1943 until the end of the war, the "Iron Dog" (the official Soviet designation) saw extensive action. Although the Russian pilots had the same problems with spin recovery, their early problems centered around the use of the radios; for most it was the first aircraft they had flown with radios! They liked its low altitude speed and maneuverability, excellent structural integrity and heavy armament.

Soviet pilots regularly mixed it up with and won over German fighters. In fact five out of ten of the highest scoring Russian pilots were P-39 jockeys. Pokryshkin was second with 59 victories, Gulaev was third with 57 and Rechkalov fourth with 56, this with the "worst fighter plane of the war!" It must be said however that the Eastern front was a different kind of war in many ways. For fighter planes there was no long range, high altitude strategic bombing escort duty, instead it was low-level tactical bombing and dog-fighting which was where the P-39 excelled.

So there you have it. The P-39 was a failure with the USAAC and the RAF, a howling success with the Soviets. The experts say it was because the western allies were fighting a different kind of air war than the Russians. Whatever the reason, it's the saga of a fighter plane that was "different" from the day it first rolled out onto the tarmac in 1939.

Of the number built, 9,558, only 2 are known to be still airworthy.

Author Bio:

Michael Russell

Michael Russell has been involved in online business since early 2001, and whilst spending countless hours each month running his business still finds time for various hobbies and interests.

You can also reach this article by using: air travel, air travel finder, cheap air flights air travel finder, cheap air flights travel tips
 
 
 

Related Articles

 
New Orleans
 
Discover the Paris-Beauvais Airport
 
Whistler BC Ski Vacations - 9 Local Secrets for Getting Top Value
 
Why Do We Call UFOs; Unidentified Flying Objects?
 
Kiev City Guide For Travelers
 
Orlando Luxury Resorts
 
Disney Cruise - Bahamas
 
Why Cruising Is A Perfect Fit For A Family Reunion
 
Hello from Vancouver (2) - Wheeling Around Stanley Park
 
India Himalayas Trekking
 
 
 
 

Car Rental Rates And How To Take Advantage Of Them

Car rental rates are usually governed to some extent by length or rental so you can get hourly rates ... - John Abrahams
 

Not Traveling Again: What's Your Excuse This Year?

Not Traveling Again: What's your Excuse this Year? - Isaac Rau
 

Single Travel: Meet People the Fun Way!

Ready to meet new people (and possibly the man of your dreams)? Here's a surefire way to do it! - Terry Hernon MacDonald
 
 

Tips for Travelling Abroad - Travel Checklists for Travellers

If you are travelling abroad here are some of things you need to do to make your trip easier. Learn ... - Bridget Mwape
 

Discover Mount Fuji - Views from the Top of Japan

You are a fool if you don't climb Mount Fuji, you are also a fool if you climb it twice. - Hige Sori
 

Vacation Getaway's and Healthy Living Tips

Going away on a vacation brings numerous benefits. It refreshes our enthusiasm, helps us to know our ... - Darren Herbold
 

Luxury All Inclusive Resort Mexico

Is not taking a luxury all inclusive resort vacation not all about getting totally spoiled? The fact ... - Chelsea Aubin
 

Why Visit Magical Cape Town?

What makes Cape Town, South Africa tick? Find out some of the best things to do and see on visiting. - Helen Palmer
 
 
Main :> Security & Privacy :> ToS
© 2006-2008 www.awesomeindex.com All Rights Reserved Worldwide.